All posts
WCAG Guidelines

Is Your Website EU EAA Compliant? 6 Quick Tests to Find Out (2026)

The European Accessibility Act (EAA) is rapidly becoming a reality for businesses operating within the EU. Non-compliance isn’t just a legal risk; it...

ATAccessio Team
6 minutes read

The European Accessibility Act (EAA) is rapidly becoming a reality for businesses operating within the EU. Non-compliance isn’t just a legal risk; it impacts user experience, brand reputation, and potentially, your bottom line. Many organizations are struggling to understand how the EAA translates into practical website accessibility requirements. This article provides six quick tests to assess your website's compliance with the EAA, drawing on the latest WCAG guidelines and anticipating the landscape in 2026.

Understanding the EAA and WCAG

The EAA mandates accessibility for websites, mobile apps, and other digital services. Its primary reference point for accessibility standards is the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). WCAG is a set of internationally recognized guidelines for making web content more accessible to people with disabilities. Currently, WCAG 2.1 Level AA is the baseline, but the transition to WCAG 3.0 is underway and will significantly impact compliance requirements by 2026. Understanding this evolution is crucial.

The EAA isn’t a standard itself; it's a legal framework that references WCAG. This means your website must meet the specific WCAG criteria outlined in the EAA's implementing legislation.

The shift to WCAG 3.0 introduces several key changes, including a greater focus on cognitive accessibility and improved support for emerging technologies like AI. While WCAG 2.2 addresses some immediate gaps, WCAG 3.0’s full implementation will necessitate ongoing adaptation.

6 Quick Tests for EAA Compliance

These tests offer a preliminary assessment. A full accessibility audit by qualified professionals is always recommended for complete assurance.

1. Keyboard Navigation: Can Everything Be Accessed?

The first test assesses keyboard-only navigation. Users who cannot use a mouse (or who prefer not to) rely solely on the keyboard to interact with a website. Disconnect your mouse and try to navigate the entire site using only the Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, and arrow keys.

  • Can you reach every interactive element (links, buttons, form fields)?
  • Is the focus order logical and intuitive?
  • Are there any elements that are inaccessible or difficult to activate via keyboard?

Many websites rely heavily on JavaScript and complex interactions, creating keyboard navigation traps. For example, a modal window that steals keyboard focus, preventing access to the main page content, is a common issue. In our experience, businesses often overlook this fundamental aspect of accessibility.

2. Alternative Text for Images: Descriptive and Concise

Alternative text (alt text) provides a textual description of images for users who cannot see them, such as those using screen readers. Check that all images have meaningful alt text. Decorative images (those that don't convey essential information) should have empty alt attributes (alt="").

  • Is the alt text accurate and descriptive of the image's content and function?
  • Is the alt text concise and avoids unnecessary keywords?
  • Does the alt text accurately represent the information conveyed by the image?

A poorly written alt text can be misleading or frustrating for screen reader users. For instance, an image of a product should have alt text describing the product itself, not just “image of product.”

3. Color Contrast: Sufficient for Visibility

Insufficient color contrast between text and background makes it difficult for users with low vision or color blindness to read. Use a color contrast checker (many are available online) to verify that your site meets the WCAG 2.1 AA contrast ratio requirements (4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text). Remember that WCAG 3.0 may introduce stricter contrast requirements.

  • Does the contrast meet the minimum requirements for text, links, and other interactive elements?
  • Are there any areas where color is used to convey information that could be communicated in another way (e.g., using text labels)?

4. Form Accessibility: Labels, Instructions, and Error Handling

Forms are a critical interaction point for many websites. Ensure your forms are accessible by providing clear labels for all form fields, providing instructions where necessary, and implementing robust error handling.

  • Are form labels properly associated with their corresponding input fields?
  • Are error messages clear, concise, and easily identifiable?
  • Does the form provide helpful instructions and guidance for users?

Hidden form labels are a common accessibility pitfall. They may be visually hidden but still impact screen reader output, often presenting confusing or irrelevant information. Proper labeling is essential for a positive user experience.

5. Headings and Structure: Logical Hierarchy

Proper use of headings (H1, H2, H3, etc.) creates a logical document structure that allows screen reader users to quickly navigate and understand the content. Check that your headings are used hierarchically and accurately reflect the content's organization.

  • Are headings used in a logical order (H1, then H2, then H3, etc.)?
  • Do headings accurately describe the content that follows?
  • Are there any missing or misused headings?

Skipping heading levels or using headings solely for visual styling creates a confusing and disorienting experience for screen reader users.

6. ARIA Attributes: Used Judiciously

ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) attributes provide additional semantic information to assistive technologies. However, they should be used sparingly and only when native HTML elements cannot adequately convey the necessary information. Misusing ARIA can actually decrease accessibility.

  • Are ARIA attributes used correctly and consistently?
  • Are you relying on ARIA when native HTML elements would suffice?
  • Are you avoiding ARIA antipatterns (e.g., using ARIA to override the semantics of native HTML)?

In many cases, using semantic HTML elements (e.g., <button>, <nav>, <article>) is preferable to using ARIA. Over-reliance on ARIA often indicates a deeper issue with the website's structure or code.

Case Study: A Retailer’s Compliance Journey

A large online retailer recently faced scrutiny for accessibility issues. Initial testing revealed problems with keyboard navigation, insufficient color contrast, and improperly labeled form fields. The company invested in an accessibility audit and remediation plan, ultimately improving their EAA compliance. However, they also realized that ongoing monitoring and training were essential to maintain accessibility. They began integrating accessibility checks into their development workflow, significantly reducing future issues. This also led to improved SEO and a broader customer base.

Key Takeaways

  • The EAA mandates accessibility for digital services within the EU, referencing WCAG.
  • WCAG 3.0 will introduce significant changes by 2026, demanding continuous adaptation.
  • Keyboard navigation, alt text, color contrast, form accessibility, headings, and ARIA usage are critical areas for assessment.
  • Manual testing can identify obvious issues, but a comprehensive accessibility audit is crucial for full compliance.
  • Accessibility is not a one-time fix; it requires ongoing monitoring and maintenance.

Next Steps

  1. Conduct a thorough accessibility audit: Engage a qualified accessibility consultant to perform a comprehensive assessment of your website.
  2. Prioritize remediation: Address the most critical accessibility issues first, focusing on those that impact the largest number of users.
  3. Integrate accessibility into your development workflow: Make accessibility a core consideration throughout the development lifecycle.
  4. Train your team: Provide accessibility training to your developers, designers, and content creators.
  5. Utilize AI-powered accessibility tools: Consider solutions like Accessio.ai, which leverages artificial intelligence to automatically identify and fix accessibility issues at the source code level, unlike overlay widgets that merely mask problems. AI-powered tools can significantly accelerate the remediation process and ensure consistent accessibility across your website.

Compliance with the EAA is not just about avoiding legal penalties; it’s about creating a more inclusive and user-friendly online experience for everyone. By proactively addressing accessibility, you demonstrate a commitment to inclusivity and enhance your brand reputation. Remember that the landscape is constantly evolving, and staying informed about the latest WCAG guidelines and EAA requirements is essential for continued success.

Is Your Website EU EAA Compliant? 6 Quick Tests to Find Out (2026) | AccessioAI